response to motion to disqualify attorney

/Rotate 0 endobj 215 0 obj 162 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R This motion to disqualify is based on a single and brief telephone call in October 2007 for which there is neither a record nor an estimate of duration by Chinois counsel. Once the above requirements are met, the judge must enter an order granting disqualification if the motion to disqualify is "legally sufficient.". /Lang (EN-US) /K 18 File the forms. >> /Lang (EN-US) You cannot start a case by filing a motion. endobj /S /P 86 0 obj 211 0 obj /S /P /StructTreeRoot 4 0 R >> /S /P /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /S /P /P 531 0 R Under the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct (Colorado Rules or Colo. RCP), an attorney must safeguard client confidences and secrets, subject to a few exceptions.2 The attorney is also obligated to elevate the clients interests above the interests of the attorney and the law firm. 23 [152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 44 0 R The State filed a response to the motion, see id. /P 300 0 R endobj /Pg 38 0 R /K [34 291 0 R 36] >> << >> 29 [171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R] << << >> /Lang (EN-US) /S /P << 63 0 obj >> >> endobj at 390-91. /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /Parent 6 0 R >> /P 315 0 R endobj << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) Include the date to the template with the Date option. 273 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Page /Rotate 0 /P 12 0 R 309 0 R 308 0 R null 310 0 R 311 0 R 310 0 R null 312 0 R null 57 0 R] In fact, the plaintiff's attorney conceded in open court, "I can honestly state I am not completely pre-pared to respond to the motion for summa-ry judgment." The judge, however, allowed the plaintiff to submit a brief on the . /P 12 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /Pg 46 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 314 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /K 2 << Make certain each and every area has been filled in properly. << endobj /Pg 21 0 R /StructParents 16 /Contents [483 0 R 484 0 R 485 0 R] /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 40 0 R Following this, they have two options - either to transfer the case to another judge immediately or to file a written answer with the clerk. /K 1 351 0 obj Legal Ethics 71, 77 (Winter 2014). endobj II. 360 0 obj << /Pg 46 0 R << /Contents [491 0 R 492 0 R 493 0 R] >> endobj /StructParents 8 endobj endobj stream /Lang (EN-US) /S /P >> By far the majority of successful motions to disqualify are brought on the basis of a conflict of interest with a former or concurrent client or imputation, but attorneys should also be aware that successful motions to disqualify have been brought on the following bases, among others: (1) lawyer as witness, (2) appearance of impropriety, (3) receipt of confidential data, (4) personal interest, (5) violation of the no contact rules, and (6) misconduct with a witness. /Rotate 0 >> /P 12 0 R Moreover, other witnesses are available to testify about the contested facts on which the defendant's Motion is based. 40 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) endobj << /K 2 << /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /S /Reference 13. /P 12 0 R /S /TOCI /Lang (EN-US) /S /Footnote /K 1 /Pg 17 0 R << >> /S /P >> /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 37 0 R >> the entire judicial process' when deciding a motion to disqualify an attorney pursuant to K.R.P.C. >> /S /P These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. /Lang (EN-US) /K 0 endobj /P 12 0 R >> /Contents [376 0 R 377 0 R 378 0 R] /P 508 0 R >> 97 0 obj << <> 218 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 302 0 R . /Type /Pages >> /P 509 0 R 224 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R 110 0 obj <> /Pg 27 0 R 186 0 obj 356 0 obj /Annots [] << /S /P 350 0 obj endobj /K 2 endobj /P 528 0 R Where witnesses other than the prosecutor can testify to the same matters or conversations, no compelling need exists." /S /P 115 0 obj Attorney Advertising. 70 0 obj 180 0 obj In assessing motions to disqualify based on conflicts, Colorado courts also consider (1) a clients preference for a particular counsel, (2) the clients right to confidentiality in communications with his or her attorney, (3) the integrity of the judicial process, and (4) the nature of the particular conflict of interest involved.10 Below are some important concepts that have emerged in the context of motions to disqualify.11, The Colorado Rules do not bar attorneys from representing current clients against former clients. /Parent 3 0 R /StructParents 35 /K 12 >> 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R] /S /TOCI /Pg 43 0 R 315 0 obj Courts differ on how they address motions to disqualify, especially because such motions are at times simply a litigation tactic by an opposing party in search of a strategic advantage.3 Additionally, courts are usually reluctant to interfere with a clients choice of counsel unless the conflict is real and there are few options other than to grant disqualification.4. /S /Reference /K 14 /S /P >> /Pg 23 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R 164 0 R 165 0 R 166 0 R endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 19 0 R /S /P /P 529 0 R endobj >> 152 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /P 531 0 R 1992) (citations omitted). endobj >> endobj << endobj Others are nothing more than a litigation tactic, forcing attorneys to scramble to protect valued client relationships. /Annots [] endstream endobj startxref /K [304 0 R 306 0 R 308 0 R 310 0 R 312 0 R] endobj 262 0 obj endobj endobj /K 0 << This comment makes clear that attorneys are permitted, under some circumstances, to engage in representations that are adverse to a former client. /K 9 /P 274 0 R /P 56 0 R /K 14 /Pg 23 0 R >> /K 1 /S /TOC 85 0 obj << endobj The trial judge observed the motion for recusal was likely a dilatory tactic. << As the Colorado Supreme Court has noted, [v]iolation of an ethical rule, in itself, is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for disqualification, although there typically must be evidence of a violation or potential violation of attorney ethical proscriptions, such as those centered on the duties of loyalty and fairness or those intended to protect the integrity of the process. endobj >> endobj Rule 1.432 requires that a motion to disqualify be made within a reasonable time after discovering the facts upon which the motion is based. 27 0 obj /Resources 462 0 R /P 12 0 R /S /P /Type /Page >> 30 [174 0 R 175 0 R 176 0 R] endobj << /K 12 << /S /P /S /P >> /Pg 17 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /S /TOCI 6. /S /P << /Lang (EN-US) >> >> /Tabs /S /S /P filed a motion to disqualify the judge under CCP 170.1 [challenge of trial judge for cause] based on purported bias that the judge demonstrated during the first. << /K 5 endobj /S /P /P 12 0 R endobj /Tabs /S Once a motion to disqualify the judge in question has been filed, the judge will be served a copy of the affidavit. 202 0 R] /P 12 0 R >> 266 0 obj endobj 189 0 obj >> /Pg 15 0 R endobj endobj << <> /Lang (EN-US) << /S /P at 391. 77 0 obj /P 529 0 R endobj << /Type /Page endobj /S /P /S /P /Type /Page /K 13 /P 508 0 R /Pg 15 0 R 316 0 obj 91 0 obj Additionally, the motion must be "promptly presented" to the trial court for "immediate ruling." Id. Second, take effective steps to mitigate, if not eliminate, risks that a former clients confidences and secrets might be accessible to attorneys working on a matter involving the former client. >> /Parent 10 0 R >> 284 0 obj 38 0 obj 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R 202 0 R] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] by the party /Contents [384 0 R 385 0 R 386 0 R] According to the Colorado Supreme Court, however, a court may not disqualify counsel on the basis of speculation or conjecture.6 The moving partys burden for a motion to disqualify is satisfied only when the motion to disqualify sets forth specific facts that point to a clear danger that either prejudices counsels client or his adversary.7. /Pg 16 0 R /P 55 0 R Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. /Pg 19 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Rotate 0 { 10} On July 11, 2006, the trial court ordered Bikkani to provide the discovery responses, including signed authorizations to release medical records, and notified /Pg 19 0 R 322 0 obj A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. >> << /K 35 0000006382 00000 n << >> >> /K 16 154 0 obj endobj /K 14 /K 3 /Pg 22 0 R /K 2 endobj /Type /Page /P 531 0 R /Pg 41 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) See Alps Prop., 526 F. Supp. /Contents [487 0 R 488 0 R 489 0 R] /P 12 0 R /Pg 22 0 R Here, Tenorio complied with LR 7-2(g) by filing a motion for leave to file supplemental authorities rather than filing a notice of supplemental authorities. endobj by plaintiff Plaintiffs motion is unsupported by any applicable legal authority and is not . /P 12 0 R /StructParents 33 176 0 obj <>stream /Annots [] >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [] /Length 532 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 0 331 0 obj /P 81 0 R << /Pg 16 0 R /K 20 << /S /P << /S /P /Pg 16 0 R /P 12 0 R in writing. /A 526 0 R >> /S /Reference /P 12 0 R /Pg 18 0 R << /Tabs /S << In those circumstances, courts are generally protective of confidences or secrets that the law firm or attorney may possess or to which the firm or attorney has access as a consequence of either the prior or the existing representation. /Lang (EN-US) 328 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> 127 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R 0000006483 00000 n 330 0 obj /P 509 0 R 14 [123 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R null 315 0 R 316 0 R 315 0 R null 317 0 R null /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << 303 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) 73 0 obj << /Contents [364 0 R 365 0 R 366 0 R] >> /Lang (EN-US) << endobj But lawyers should use that weapon rarely and should resist the temptation, or a client's importuning, to . /Lang (EN-US) >> /Type /Page 3 [null 304 0 R 305 0 R 304 0 R null 306 0 R 307 0 R 306 0 R null 308 0 R /S /P /K 10 /P 509 0 R 228 0 obj /Pg 25 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) >> /Contents [380 0 R 381 0 R 382 0 R] << /Lang (EN-US) You have to fill out at least 2 forms, maybe more, to file your opposition. /P 12 0 R /K 1 /K 17 endobj endobj 76 0 obj << >> /Pg 24 0 R endobj << << /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 33 0 obj endobj 16.21 et seq. /K 19 /P 12 0 R /Pg 42 0 R /K 25 >> endobj /Pg 29 0 R >> /Pg 38 0 R >> h[o\{ C@9\`d-X" ?[]&5>fR*UVSO?>|/qnou':._^:WZ.Z.Fw7w/>{_?xw?>G}N/_>}}z>xVp~/zOy_}xwMQm|_}{}?^~'v>'_]/Fkum-i^iz]:JZ_^_^_^_^_^_Y_Y_Y_Yu|]u|}u_5wuRWmVmVmV:C:C:P:~ /]2Vcu9Vcu9Vcu9.X][oW2WWsu5WWs\>rt=9u8Zk[s~VWZNNNNNNiuuu~m^|])^)^)^yuNNNNZuu&?:wmO]$uMuM7~vz?u=uHs[P;?D[R;of}f[oCchO\o^=7o?]N+B/r^No~{>#n?'_~xp@x."Zyc4k4&omcVmnX:5oM[iKfz&lrQ,eM,~e? endobj >> /K 0 /Lang (EN-US) /P 134 0 R You can find 3 available options; typing, drawing, or capturing one. >> /Pg 20 0 R /Pg 27 0 R 37 0 obj Woodard v. Dist. 35 0 obj >> 0000002614 00000 n /S /P <> /Pg 29 0 R SHARP The United States, through the undersigned attorney, hereby responds to the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. >> /P 55 0 R /K 6 /S /P >> >> The far more common motion to disqualify involves a former client, either of the law firm or of an individual attorney (who may have recently joined the firm). /K [9 309 0 R 11] 288 0 R 289 0 R 288 0 R null 290 0 R 291 0 R 290 0 R null 292 0 R 293 0 R /P 12 0 R 233 0 obj <> endobj << /S /P >> /K 5 <> /Annots [] /S /P 2022 California Rules of Court. /Pg 15 0 R /K 12 /K 7 292 0 obj APG/Z=p L_uQ7EVr+MHIRh2)Qg^HWjBY:],h(8BToqSirY[DHWBo~djX$dXS&U.uJ%Tj )].fm_ujmbzY'f}hHm=r5[9Bm^wcrz7zW>~/N endobj 6 313 0 R 7 314 0 R 8 [84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R] /S /H3 << /Lang (EN-US) HarrisT19@michigan.gov . 302 0 R null] 142 0 obj Ensure that the info you add to the Motion To Disqualify Counsel Sample Texas is up-to-date and accurate. << >> (a) A court that determines that a person has signed a pleading or motion in violation of Section 10.001may impose a sanction on the person, a party represented by the person, or both. /P 12 0 R /Resources 387 0 R /StructParents 20 195 0 obj 347 0 obj endobj /Resources 486 0 R 3d at 812. << 353 0 obj endobj >> 138 0 obj /Annots [] /P 508 0 R /Strikeout /Span 18 0 obj /P 508 0 R /S /Reference /S /P 126 0 obj ANSWER or RESPONSE DATE. /Pg 19 0 R >> /K 1 >> /Lang (EN-US) 334 0 obj /P 12 0 R /S /TOCI /S /P An important requirement contained in rule 2.160 (e) is that a disqualification motion must be made within 10 days after the "discovery of the facts constituting the grounds" for the motion. on January 7, 2002. As with the substantial relationship test, whether an attorneys playbook knowledge is sufficient for disqualification is heavily dependent on the facts. >> /Pg 32 0 R /Tabs /S /S /P startxref /Pg 15 0 R 255 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<9A3F555EF45C79488712E0D1EABAE832>]/Index[233 34]/Info 232 0 R/Length 107/Prev 253809/Root 234 0 R/Size 267/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream >> >> You will now be taken from the global Dentons website to the $redirectingsite website. 156 0 obj endobj << endobj /K 8 endobj /StructParents 29 << Ct., 704 P.2d 851, 853 (Colo. 1985)). The law with respect to disqualification varies depending on the conflict relation and the poten-tially harmed party. /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Pg 44 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) >> (Att. /Pg 17 0 R << << Official websites use .gov << /P 282 0 R 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R 96 0 R /K 31 endstream /P 12 0 R This Comment will focus on those cases in which an attorney moves to disqualify opposing counsel because the . /K 1 /K 11 /K [14 281 0 R 16] /Rotate 0 /Type /Pages /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) >> 288 0 obj >> 312 0 obj /Annots [] /P 12 0 R endobj 15 316 0 R 16 [127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) 234 0 obj Defendant's Motion at 1-3. >> /Annots [] 5 [73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 313 0 R 80 0 R /P 12 0 R >> /K [5 512 0 R] /K 12 << /Lang (EN-US) /K 0 /Pg 22 0 R >> endobj >> /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 32 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R 209 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 17 0 R /S /P /Pg 17 0 R /K 20 endobj endobj << endobj 20 [142 0 R 143 0 R] /S /P /P 508 0 R /P 12 0 R >> /P 508 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 45 0 R << /Type /Page >> endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> 197 0 obj 136 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) 274 0 obj << 339 0 obj /Type /Pages /Filter /FlateDecode >> /K 24 1990); United States v. Brothers, 856 F. Supp. The motion can be brought by either a prosecutor . /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 18 0 R /K 21 /Lang (EN-US) << /Resources 494 0 R /K 19 << /P 12 0 R The facts stated in Mrs. Landes' Response to the Motion to Disqualify, are true and correct, including the fact that I do not have Mr. Cuzdey's client file. /Lang (EN-US) /P 298 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) >> endobj << << /K 3 << ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify is GRANTED and Andrew J. Cevasco, Esquire is disqualified pursuant to New Jersey Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7 from serving as legal counsel for the Defendants at the trial in this matter; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to R. 1:5-1(a) that a copy of this Order will be >> /P 531 0 R endobj 361 0 obj /K 2 >> endobj 208 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) << /K 17 /S /P /S /P Visit the Civil General Use forms page.. Self-Help Resources Formularios en Espaol. 1. <> /Tabs /S endobj /P 508 0 R >> 148 0 obj /A 515 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 219 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Tabs /S /K 0 12. /Parent 8 0 R 223 0 obj /S /H1 /S /P /Pg 33 0 R /K 6 Response to Motion to Disqualify Counsel and Law Firm [Doc. /P 505 0 R /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << 253 0 R 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R 262 0 R 0964387 U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division 1601 Elm Street, Suite 4950 Dallas, Texas 75201-4717 (214) 880-9401. << endobj /S /P /K 41 /K 16 You need a written motion signed by both your client and yourself, and sworn to by your client. endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) /P 4 0 R >> endobj /Annots [423 0 R 424 0 R] My name is Adam C. Sloane. endobj /Tabs /S The instant motion was filed eleven days after all the testimony had been taken and five days after the judge had announced his ruling. >> /Contents [449 0 R 450 0 R 451 0 R] << << 0000004782 00000 n >> In determining whether to disqualify an attorney on the ground that he or she will likely be a witness, the court is guided, but not bound by, the standards set forth in Rule 3.7, and whether to disqualify an attorney rests in the sound discretion of the Court. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /StructParents 26 232 0 obj /Count 5 /Type /Page /S /Link /K 2 /S /P 12] and Memorandum in Support [Doc. /S /P /P 505 0 R >> /K 3 /Kids [6 0 R 7 0 R 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R] << >> /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 164 0 R >> /Pg 27 0 R 294 0 R 296 0 R 298 0 R 300 0 R 302 0 R] Brown v. Encompass Ins. << /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R << << /A 499 0 R 123 0 obj Id. /Lang (EN-US) /K 5 /S /P >> >> endobj United States v. Wallach, 788 F. Supp. << endobj >> >> /Lang (EN-US) /StructParents 0 endobj /Pg 15 0 R /S /P /P 12 0 R /Footnote /Note 105 0 obj 28 0 obj Mealey's (February 27, 2023, 2:08 PM EST) -- WHEELING, W.Va. A federal judge in West Virginia denied a hydraulic fracturing company's second attempt to disqualify the counsel for landowners in a dispute over abandoned wells, ruling that there is no ethical violation on the part of the fracking operator's former employee Bryan "Wayne . /P 506 0 R 255 0 obj >> All Responses to Motions and Answers to Petitions must be filed with the Office of Judicial Records and submitted to the Motion Clerk on or before the Response Date. /S /P /S /TOCI Attempting to defeat the motion without advising the client is not an acceptable solution. A motion to disqualify should be made with "reasonable promptness" after the party becomes aware of the conflict so that it cannot be used as a strategic tool to deprive his opponent of counsel after a substantial amount of time has been spent on a case. /Type /Page /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) 112 0 obj << /S /P Motion to Disqualify an Attorney in Florida What Is a Motion to Disqualify an Attorney? << /Resources 498 0 R << _______________/s/_______________ MARK R. ROSMAN Attorney-in-Charge Florida State Bar No. % >> 65 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R >> >> 226 0 obj /P 12 0 R Smithj46@michigan.gov / PLAINTIFF CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY . endobj 160 0 obj /K [1 326 0 R 15] /K 1 << /K 43 >> /Pg 15 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 123 0 R /S /P >> /Pg 16 0 R endobj 41 0 obj /P 528 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Tabs /S /Type /StructTreeRoot /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 252 0 obj 0000009145 00000 n /Pg 15 0 R 7 0 obj <> /Pg 22 0 R 00021 Motion to Strike Defendant BRIAN FROST's Affirmative Defenses. /S /P 204 0 obj ), aff'd, 979 F.2d 912 (2d Cir. /K 9 /K 23 endobj << endobj >> 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R /Annots [] << 0000005497 00000 n /K 3 >> /S /TOCI Ct. App . As noted, this order addresses . /Lang (EN-US) In those circumstances, courts are generally protective of confidences or secrets that the law firm or attorney may possess or to which the firm or attorney has access as a consequence of either the prior or the existing representation. /Lang (EN-US) endobj 233 0 obj are satisfied. /Pg 15 0 R << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj >> 243 0 R 244 0 R 245 0 R 246 0 R 247 0 R 248 0 R 249 0 R 250 0 R 251 0 R 252 0 R endobj endobj Depending on the circumstances, a law firm may also consider reporting the motion to its legal malpractice insurer, as a motion to disqualify may be a precursor to a bar grievance or a legal malpractice claim. endobj /Lang (EN-US) The motion is legally sufficient if it shows the party's well-grounded fear that the party will not receive a fair trial. /Rotate 0 /Lang (EN-US) endobj /P 133 0 R /Pg 35 0 R /Pg 38 0 R endobj /Pg 46 0 R /Pg 27 0 R >> endobj /Lang (EN-US) /StructParents 30 << . /P 508 0 R /P 12 0 R << /S /Reference <> The Motion Clerk shall enter the "Answer" or "Response" Date on the Cover Sheet. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj << /K 26 /Parent 8 0 R /S /P << >> /K 3 The government does not contest the fact that prosecutors Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp met with the defendant on June 21, 1995, and that the defendant was offered immunity, which he declined to accept. /Resources 482 0 R /Pg 43 0 R The defendant asserts that the prosecutors are material witnesses in this case because they "have personal knowledge of material, exculpatory information which is crucial to the defense." >> /Lang (EN-US) /P 306 0 R As far as I can tell, Mary Ann Strickler, is still a licensed and practicing attorney. /K 15 endobj endobj /Pg 15 0 R /K 0 endobj /S /P << /StructParents 17 /K [54 301 0 R 56] << endobj 10 filed 06/26/19 PageID.515 Page 2 of 32 /P 12 0 R Despite the Attorney General's best attempts to cast himself a super- Terre Du Lac Property Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Shrum, 661 S.W.2d 45, 48 (Mo. /Resources 448 0 R 0000001860 00000 n Finally, assess whether the firm or different counsel should defend the motion to disqualify. endobj /Pg 20 0 R /Type /Page /P 12 0 R /Tabs /S /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 15 0 R endobj 0000000896 00000 n /Pg 41 0 R /P 531 0 R /Tabs /S For the reasons stated below, Petitioner's Motion to Disqualify Counsel . /P 12 0 R 49 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /S /P >> << >> /S /P 325 0 obj /Pg 20 0 R According to the Colorado Supreme Court, however, a court may not disqualify counsel on the basis of speculation or conjecture.. /Lang (EN-US) << /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /P 12 0 R /K 27 >> /S /P (quoting People ex rel. /Parent 9 0 R << /S /H2 /P 12 0 R /Parent 8 0 R << /Pg 30 0 R /K 0 >> /Pg 39 0 R << >> /S /P /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj >> /S /P /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /A 522 0 R >> endobj << /K [322 0 R 324 0 R] endobj >> endobj << << /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 46 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 46 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /K [30 289 0 R 32] /Pg 36 0 R /K 25 /Lang (EN-US) >> /P 162 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 0 /P 296 0 R /Kids [30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R] /S /P /Lang (EN-US) Response to Motion to Disqualify, 8/14/17, at 10. << /Lang (EN-US) /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Tabs /S /P 56 0 R /Pg 36 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> /Pg 45 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 28 0 R Attorneys should be aware, however, that clients can make a successful case for disqualifying attorneys who had a greatly invested role with the organizational client or where the playbook knowledge is uniquely and particularly relevant to the new representation.
Fulton County Commissioner Salary, Haulage Traction Work, Neighbor Threatened To Kill My Cat, Steve Palmer Obituary, Articles R